University
Subject
Module Code
Marking criteria for Group Poster Group learning critical review: 40%
Review of performance against criteria (see learning review pro-forma for details)
• Your critical review should be supported by analysis of relevant and specific examples
• Key challenges and how these were overcome
An analysis of how the group functioned (e.g. assignment of roles, leadership, problem solving, record keeping, conflict, conflict resolution, decision making methodology)< An evaluation of what the group would do differently in future collaborative teamwork and problem solving
Evidence of reflection on learning processes
Critical Summary: 40%
Critical summary that includes the group’s own written reflections on the process of learning and a critical evaluation of the theories and theoretical perspective employed; including evaluation of the effectiveness of the group’s secondary desk research into the industry and market and the reliability and trustworthiness of your recommendations
Engagement with the academic literature and desk research: 10%
Research, engagement with wider reading, quality/relevance of academic sources, referencing
Presentation skills: 10%
Design of poster: appropriate layout, use of space, colour, font and images. Logical organization of material, appropriate level detail.
Research Proposal – The role of AI in the selection processes of skilled employees.
Topic- The role of AI in the selection processes of skilled employees. Aim- To analyse the impact...
Mental Health Issues
Quality Content Writing Firm


